The Home Stretch


If there were a goddess, I would be thanking her profusely that the Democratic and Republican party prayer and praise meetings, I mean pep rallies, uhh, for some reason they call them conventions, are now over! We’re now about two months away from the American presidential election, about which you’ve heard (lots of) bits and pieces for the past two years. By now, you know that the tickets are:

Democrats: Obama/Biden
Republicans: McCain/Palin

Common wisdom holds that Obama chose Biden as his running mate because of the latter’s extensive knowledge of foreign affairs. As far as McCain’s choice of Palin, common wisdom holds that McCain is hoping to capture a) disenchanted Hillary Clinton supporters and b) disenchanted evangelical Christians. It remains to be seen how successful he will be with (a), but he has scored some points on item (b). Dr. James Dobson, of Focus on the Family infamy, said,

“Sen. McCain’s selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is an outstanding choice that should be extremely reassuring to the conservative base of his party. She is a strong executive who hates corruption and puts principle above politics. After floating the names of Tom Ridge and Sen. Joe Lieberman in recent weeks – selections that would have created consternation among pro-family Republicans – Sen. McCain has chosen a solid conservative who has a reputation for espousing common sense.

“Gov. Palin’s commitment to the sanctity of life is not just a political position. She was advised to abort her fifth and youngest child when it was learned he had Down syndrome. She refused. That’s bravery and integrity in action.

“Gov. Palin’s views align with Sen. McCain’s own stated position that human life is precious and must be protected – and that gives us confidence he will keep his pledges to voters regarding the kinds of justices he would nominate to the Supreme Court and the way he would conduct our nation’s domestic and international affairs. This selection by Sen. McCain is a very encouraging sign for his campaign.”

I have two questions for evangelical Christians. The first one is directed toward Dr. Dobson and his evangelical band: do you honestly believe that abortion is the most pressing issue in either the USA or the world at large right now? For all your prattle about human life, one would think you’d pry your eyes away from embryos and fetuses for at least a few seconds and look at the thousands of American soldiers who have been killed in Iraq, plus the tens of thousands of American soldiers who have been maimed in Iraq, plus the scores of thousands of Iraqi citizens who have been killed and maimed in Iraq, and pay some attention to their concerns. There are also other issues besides Iraq, such as the shaky American economy (which is due, in part, to the Mess in Iraq), the USA’s poor standing in world relations, a struggling public education system, the obscene and obscenely growing gap between wealth and want in our country and the USA’s continued addiction to oil as our primary source of energy and global warming (which happens to be much more real than your god, regardless of your belief to the contrary). Since this is by no means an exhaustive list, I invite readers to add their contributions in the comments.

My second question, which I extend beyond Dobson and his minions to evangelicals in general, is this: are you going to allow McCain and the Republican party to manipulate you yet again? Can’t you see that they simply want to win the election by any means they deem necessary, and they’ll court your votes to do that? McCain has reversed himself shamelessly for more than a year to gain your votes. He’s an ambitious huckster with a volatile temper. Everyone should think long, hard and carefully before casting a vote for him. Moreover, he and the party movers and shakers will laugh behind your backs all the way to the White House. And they’ll be sneering at your gullibility all the way. For America’s sake, please read David Kuo’s insider’s revelations of what many Republicans think of you! They think you’re easily manipulated dupes. And if you go along with them yet again, you’ll prove them right.

With regard to Hillary supporters, I’m guessing that most of them us will see through this ploy and refuse to be hoodwinked. I, for one, am insulted that McCain expects women to vote for his ticket on the bases of gender and disappointment rather than issues. Excuse, me, Senator, but women have functioning brains and most of us care about issues. We want our country to make substantive progress in addressing women’s concerns. We will not reward your disgusting use of a woman as a trophy running mate. Governor Palin is smart, pretty and charismatic, but those attributes do not warrant voting for her. It so happens that Sarah Palin is on the wrong side of every women’s issue on the table. That fact alone should cause women to think long and hard about voting for the McCain/Palin ticket. The Republicans have combined Senator McCain’s frail health, questionable mental acuity and ever-shifting positions with Governor Palin’s charm and errant vision to create one of the most disastrous political combos in American history.

Obviously, I will not be voting for McCain/Palin. Let me state clearly that, while I honestly believe that Obama and Biden are better for the USA and the world right now than McCain and Palin (or nearly any of the current crop of Republicans), I have grave misgivings about the Democratic party. The Democratic party’s leadership of Congress over the past two years has been missing in action. It may be more accurately described as a mission dedicated to inaction. Instead of using the past two years to begin correcting the disastrous course initiated by our current commander decider-in-chief, the Democrats have continually acquiesced to the will of the least popular president in recent history. I can only surmise that their strategy has been to ride the wave of Bush’s unpopularity into a clean sweep of power in both houses of Congress and the White House this year. It’s a naked political ploy - and it may well fail.

How can the Democrats possibly fail now, you may ask? Easily, I answer. In the recent past, they’ve repeatedly demonstrated that they are remarkably adept at throwing away elections that should be theirs for the taking. The Democrats, by and large, are political amateurs compared to the Republicans. They almost always let the Republicans frame the issues and set the terms (and terminology) of their debates. To take one example, which is still in its embryonic stage, Obama and the Democrats must not allow the Republicans to turn this into a competition between Obama and Palin. It is not. Obama’s opponent is McCain. That is the only competitor to whom Obama should pay attention. The more often the Republicans can thrust the articulate and charming Sarah Palin into the limelight (and keep the awkward McCain out of sight), the better their chances at winning this election will become. The Democrats cannot ignore Governor Palin completely, but they must not elevate her to a primary role in the campaign. Moreover, Obama and Biden are both intelligent and articulate men. They can easily defeat McCain and Palin, convincingly yet gracefully, on the merits of their positions. Having said that, they must not make the common Democratic error of sounding too bookish. They must reveal their depth, their passion and their compassion without talking down to voters. The Democrats can win this election, but they must be smart about it, because the Republicans certainly will be. Neither the USA nor the world can afford for the Democrats to allow the Republicans to wrest yet another election from their grasp.

– the chaplain

Why Selflessness is Immoral


Selflessness or altruism means putting the interests of others above yourself. Just as “selfishness” has negative connotations in society of self-interest at the expense of others, “altruism” is often thought of as kind or generous acts for others. This view is wrong. It is wrong because the originator of the term himself, Auguste Comte, meant it to mean precisely what it implies: acting for the sake of others with no thought to oneself.

It is this true original definition of altruism that I am using here, and I will use altruism and selflessness interchangeably.

Selflessness is irrational. It is irrational because it demands that the beneficiary of your actions be others. Does it suggest who these others should be? That is a decision an individual would make for himself based on his personal values. But, since altruism dictates that we should hold our interests or values in no regard when acting, altruism actually states that the personal value of the beneficiary be irrelevant to our action! By this “logic” not only would giving money to a drug-dealing rapist be just as moral as giving money to an orphanage, it would be more moral!

Why is that? It comes down to personal values. To suggest that some people are more worthy than others to benefit from acts of generosity implies that one has made a value judgment oneself in such matters based on a personal evaluation of worth. But acting in accordance with one’s personal values is a SELFISH act. Choosing to help your friend over a stranger is a selfish act. Choosing to save the life of your lover over the life of an enemy is a selfish act. Going to work and spending your hard-earned money on yourself and not giving it to every beggar in the street who asks is a selfish act. Conversely, giving help to an unknown over a friend would be selfless. Giving up the life of your lover so that a hated person could live would be a selfless act. Coming home from work and handing out £50 notes to people you see on the street would be a selfless act. Selfless means “otherness”; it means the defiance of personal values.

Clearly, this is not the sort of moral guide most altruists have in mind when they talk about “selflessness” (although many altruists do, such as the religious), yet that is exactly what their “morality” means, and if they disagree they don’t understand their own moral position.

A perfect example of this self-contradiction is in a recent post by the humanist Ebonmuse:

Instead, what brings happiness is participation - interaction with the world and exploration of all it has to offer, our relationships to friends and loved ones and a larger community, and selfless labor for the good of others.” (Bold mine)

Notice that our friends, our loved ones, our community, our happiness, our interaction are cited as positive things. Positive for whom? Beneficial for whom? For us! These are selfish values. They are a personal value to us, and we act on them because we derive benefit from them. Yet Ebonmuse also insists that our labour be totally unrelated to personal value! So which is it? Should our actions be selfish or selfless? You cannot have it both ways.

Proponents of “selfless morality” (a contradiction in terms) will fiercely disagree and claim that I am attacking a strawman or twisting their position. But clearly I am not: to use any personal values as a guide to making decisions is a selfish act. Selflessness requires the contradiction of personal values; it requires that one act for the sake of acting, for no personal benefit at all. And if you disagree that this is the correct course of action you should not call yourself an altruist or promote selflessness.

The belief that an act (or anything) is good or bad in itself is intrinsicism. However nothing can be good or bad in itself. “Good” or “bad” provoke the question: good or bad to whom? Which implies that someone or something can make a value judgment concerning the objective effect that something in reality will have in regard to their existence. There is only one thing in existence that can do this: consciousness. Moral value judgments arise because of a consciousness’ relation to reality. This is simply, and self-evidently because, for there to be “good” or “bad” – value or non-value, there must be a valuer.

This personal evaluation of what is beneficial or detrimental to a conscious being has to be performed by that conscious being. By identifying the type of being it is and its relationship to reality, a being can discover what is of value to its life and what is not; what is “good” for its life and what is “bad” – and this is what morality is: a code of values to guide actions. That is why true objective morality is not a duty, or set of rules passed on by authority, or a guidebook invented by man. It is something that can, that has to be, objectively discovered by humans; by each human.

For this reason, morality is a personal matter – it is a guide for each of us how to live our lives. It is not an ethereal magical phenomena that arises through social behaviour; it is not determined by social norm or majority whim or evolutionary instinct.

Since morality is a code of values to guide actions, it is necessary that these values be rationally discovered – otherwise they would not correspond to reality and would therefore be useless as a guide to any action. But selflessness would demand the contradiction of our values. It would demand of us sacrifice.

The morality of altruism is the morality of sacrifice: the giving up of higher values for lower ones; surrendering what is of more value to you for what is of less or none. Just as giving up £100 for £5 is irrational, so is sacrificing your values to non-values. But the irrational cannot be the moral, since it is only moral values that can be a guide in our life. Therefore, selflessness and altruism are positively immoral – they require the irrational nonsensical valueless abandonment of our values for a non-existence supposedly intrinsic immanent “good”.

The sacrifice of values cannot result in happiness, since happiness is the lasting joy that arises from achieving our values. Our values guide our actions, and ultimately every action has a purpose, and our ultimate purpose is: life. There is only one alternative: death. And since selfishly pursuing one’s own values is the moral guide to achieve happiness, selflessness is ultimately the immoral guide to achieving suffering. Rational egoism holds life as the standard. Selflessness’s standard is death.

- Evanescent

(originally published on evanescent)

It’s cool, I’m still alive

… and I’ll be writing again soon.

I had to recover from some of the hatemail = ]

Anyway, I thought that I’d simply ask YOU all what YOU want to know. About mormons and our nutty religion [and yes, ok, I'll be taking personal questions, haha]. It just seems like you are all much more educated on it than I thought, and since this is a democracy, I like to hear from the people.

In the meantime, I leave you with this…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

… because I find it hilarious.

Life Photo Meme: Honor an Invert Day!



I see you....


click the photo to enlarge if you can't see it, too.

I've been wondering what to post today. Sure, I have a load of nudibranch pictures, but wanted to offer some variety. Then I saw this little gal just now and he was nice enough to let me photograph her very close up.



The girls had been complaining about the noise. "What is that?" they've been asking. Now we have the answer.



This is the Greater Angle Wing (or Broad Winged) Katydid (Microcentrum rhombifolium).

Kingdom Animalia
Phylum Arthropoda
Class Insecta
Order Orthoptera
Suborder Ensifera
Family Tettigoniidae
Species Microcentrum rhombifolium

“Only our party can fix the damage that our party has caused.”

Good friggin' grief - how can McCain be such a brazen lying bastard and not get struck by lightning? And how can anyone be so brain-dead as to buy this BS?
"John McCain doesn't run with the Washington herd," said Palin, the surprise pick as McCain's running mate.

"It's over. It's over. It's over for the special interests," McCain promised. "We're going to start working for the people of this country."
For crying out loud - McCain has been working for the special interests for 22 years! He's been taking millions from lobbyists and dishing out billions to them in cronyist corporate welfare!
"These are tough times for many of you, in the state of Michigan, times are tough," McCain said.
And who caused the tough times? I don't suppose it was the party that has held a monopoly on political power for most of the last eight years? The party that is synonymous with greed, corruption, arrogance and incompetence? The party of which McCain is a senior member?
"Change is coming, change is coming," McCain promised the audience, borrowing the same theme that Democrat Barack Obama has made the centerpiece of his run for the White House.
You've had 22 years in the Senate, and you can't even come up with your own slogan, let alone change anything? Bite me, you old bastard.

Jeez! If it's true that people get the politicians they deserve, then Americans must be the most evil people on Earth.

(Comment on this post)

What Alaskan women think of Palin

In a word, not much.
  • She is really just a mayor from a small town outside Anchorage who has been a governor for only 1.5 years, and has ZERO national and international experience. I shudder to think that she could be the person taking that 3AM call on the White House hotline, and the one who could potentially be charged with leading the US in the volatile international scene that exists today. --Rose M., Fairbanks, AK
  • She is VERY, VERY conservative, and far from perfect. She's a hunter and fisherwoman, but votes against the environment again and again. She ran on ethics reform, but is currently under investigation for several charges involving hiring and firing of state officials. She has NO experience beyond Alaska. --Christine B., Denali Park, AK
  • As an Alaskan and a feminist, I am beyond words at this announcement. Palin is not a feminist, and she is not the reformer she claims to be. --Karen L., Anchorage, AK
  • Alaskans, collectively, are just as stunned as the rest of the nation. She is doing well running our State, but is totally inexperienced on the national level, and very much unequipped to run the nation, if it came to that. She is as far right as one can get, which has already been communicated on the news. In our office of thirty employees (dems, republicans, and nonpartisans), not one person feels she is ready for the V.P. position. --Sherry C., Anchorage, AK
  • She's vehemently anti-choice and doesn't care about protecting our natural resources, even though she has worked as a fisherman. McCain chose her to pick up the Hillary voters, but Palin is no Hillary. --Marina L., Juneau, AK
  • I think she's far too inexperienced to be in this position. I'm all for a woman in the White House, but not one who hasn't done anything to deserve it. There are far many other women who have worked their way up and have much more experience that would have been better choices. This is a patronizing decision on John McCain's part- and insulting to females everywhere that he would assume he'll get our vote by putting "A Woman" in that position. --Jennifer M., Anchorage, AK
John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate is a desperate and dangerous gimmick. We cannot run the risk of being saddled with this inexperienced, untested Podunk politician, not to mention McCain's foul temper, poor impulse control and failing mental facilities. At least Dick Cheney was intelligent enough to know which laws he was breaking, and why those laws existed, but Palin is even more dangerous: an extremist filled with righteous certitude and openly contemptuous of due process, as the myriad scandals in which she is currently mired amply demonstrate.

I'd rather have John Cleese and Michael Palin than John McCain and Sarah Palin!

(Comment on this post)

The gaffes keep on coming…

Considering how long John McCain has been dicking over the troops, and hiding behind his decades-old POW experience while stabbing them in the back by voting at George Bush Junior's behest to cut their pay and block them from receiving health care and educational benefits, it's no surprise that he wouldn't know what Walter Reed Hospital looks like - I doubt he's ever been near it.

But I'm surprised that the party that worships the great twin gods Free Market and Private Property has such a track record of ripping off other people's intellectual property, i.e. songs and music. The latest victim is the group Heart, who are understandably pissed that the McCain campaign has stolen their song Barracuda. Apparently this was Sarah Palin's nickname in high school, and I gather it wasn't exactly affectionate, but now she is wearing it as a badge of honor. Which is kind of appropriate when you read the lyrics:

And if the real thing don't do the trick
You better make up something quick
You gonna burn, burn, burn, burn, burn to the wick
Ooh! Barracuda

(Comment on this post)

Minorities + Religion = Depression

A new longitudinal study shows that for whites and blacks, religious participation leads to “fewer symptoms of depression.” No surprise there. You figure life won’t be as bad when you’re part of a tight knit community.

But surprisingly, the same stat doesn’t hold true for everyone:

… for some Latino and Asian-American adolescents, attending church more often was actually affecting their mood in a negative way.

Asian-American adolescents who reported high levels of participation in their church had the highest number of depressive symptoms among teens of their race.

Likewise, Latino adolescents who were highly active in their church were more depressed than their peers who went to church less often. Females of all races and ethnic groups were also more likely to have symptoms of depression than males overall.

It gets worse for minority women. For example, Asian females have it pretty bad. The authors say this in the discussion section of the paper:

Asian girls who attend religious services may not only experience psychological and social tensions between religious, Asian, and mainstream cultures, but may also suffer from a subordinate status within the religious institutions they attend, contributing to higher depression.

The obvious question: Why do you think this is the case?

An abstract of the main paper is here but you can just read the entire thing for free.

Incidentally, I also found this chart posted by Razib to be very interesting:

Religious Beliefs and Practices, By Race
(Source: The Barna Group, Ventura, CA)

white black Hispanic Asian
Read the Bible in the last week 36% 59% 39% 20%
Attended religious service in past week 41% 48% 38% 23%
Prayed to God in the past week 81% 91% 86% 46%
Participated in a small group, past week 16% 31% 27% 13%
Bible is totally accurate (strongly agree) 36% 57% 40% 24%
Satan is not a living being (strongly disagree) 30% 27% 30% 14%
Jesus Christ sinned while on earth (strongly disagree) 37% 49% 35% 22%
Born again Christian 41% 47% 29% 12%
Atheist or agnostic 12% 5% 7% 20%
Aligned with a non-christian faith 11% 12% 10% 45%
Subgroup size 1695 330 360 94


Another hour, another gaffe?

Every time McCain or his staff says something about Palin, another
blooper pops up.

{{Retrieved from geoffarnold.com via RSS/ATOM.}}

Another hour, another gaffe?

Where Is The Intestinal Fortitude To Prosecute This Administration

We have a sitting president in the United States that has essentially thumbed his nose at the law, the citizens and most of the world. He and his cabinet have subverted the Constitution, invaded the privacy of millions of Americans, launched war against a sovereign nation under false pretenses and there is good indication that the lame duck leader and his 'yes' men have knowingly lied under oath, withheld evidence and falsified documents. This so-called leader has used scare tactics to get his...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

This is why I like dreamhost

About a week ago I noticed a sudden spike in my Private Hosting memory consumption. And when I say a spike, I mean a spike

dreamhost ps

Literally within a day I was through the roof and I had absolutely no idea why. I had attributed my previous increase in consumption to a recent traffic increase but a jump like that was ridiculous.

I was fairly certain that this must be a malfunctioning script running somewhere but a quick ps -e didn’t give me any hints. So I turned to Dreamhost support. I fired a quick ticket and got my first reply within 2 days and unfortunately it wasn’t what I wished for.

Basically, the support told me that they cannot know what I am running on my site and thus cannot really help me. I should figure it out myself. Needless to say I was a bit disappointed.

Thanks for the reply Brian but I’m a bit dissapointed. Your reply was basically “we can’t help you. Figure it out yourself” which is a bit of a letdown compared to what I’m used from Dreamhost support.

The thing is, that in the Dreamhost PS information, you mention that 300Mb should be enough for a top 100 blog. I don’t even have a top 100k blog and I do not run any custom code. I run 3 wordpress blogs and 2 galleries and that’s it.

While I can imagine that some plugin is malfunctioning or possibly a site being hacked and running custom code, I’m not an expert on this stuff and without full access it get pretty impossible for me to figure it out.

I can understand that Dreamhost cannot be expected to troubleshoot everyone’s usage, but on the other hand for someone now really knowledgeable this sounds just wrong. From what my point of view, the “usage”, which I cannot verify in any way independently and does not have any visible basis, could just steadily keep increasing to 2000Mb and I couldn’t do anything about it other than just fork out money.

In any case, I’ll see if I can find anything myself

One more day passed and then I had a much better response. Another support person took over and gave me some tips to try as well as some possible command. ps auxe > serverlog

So I gave it a try and, lo and behold, now 4 misbehaving scripts were revealed. One was an instance of my very own complexlife plugin taking up 15% of the ram, while the other 3 where instances of the photodropper plugin, each taking a 10% . Altogether pretty much explained why my usage was so extreme.

So it was time to bring out my good friend -kill- and get me rid of some unruly processes.


Whoop-de-doop, my memory consumption is back to sane levels. This is why it pays to have some good support at your company. I’m happy once more D


Other similar posts you might also enjoy: Dreamhost PS activated! | Self-hosting addendum: Host Selection | How to hunt for Wordpress performance hogs

Party details!

We have a time and a place for the big millionth comment party in Minneapolis in less than two weeks. Attendees: get the full scoop from Greg Laden's Blog.

I'll be bringing my big pink furry octopus and Skatje. You don't want to miss it.

Read the comments on this post...

Madison details

You asked for them, here's the flyer:

pzflyer.jpg
Read the comments on this post...

Madison details

You asked for them, here's the flyer:

pzflyer.jpg
Read the comments on this post...

A shout out to Asse, Belgium: HJHOP’s 150,000th visitor.

I could not make that name up, even if I wanted to. Apparently, I was contacted by a vole or perhaps a field mouse: HJ

Will the South Wales Echo now apologise to Muslims?

THE last time the South Wales Echo squared up to religion, religion – in the guise of Stephen “Birdshit” Green – shouted back BOO! The paper scuttled away in full panic mode, apologised to Christians for offending them, and promptly removed the offending item – a column by Dan O’Neill – from its website.

Well, O’Neill has done it again. This time, under the headline What’s Happened to Freedom of Speech?, he’s had a pop at:

Muslim zealots with their orchestrated bellows of ‘Behead the infidel’.

O’Neill also pointed out that:

We have allowed ourselves to be intimidated to the extent that we now seem fearful of offering any criticism at all of Islam – even when Muslims themselves see no offence.

One example he gave concerned comedian Katy Brand.  She planned to include a sketch in her ITV show, a send-up of the Vicar of Dibley called the Imam of Dibley. She explained:

Katy Brand

Katy Brand

A new imam arrives in a sleepy parish and the comedy stems from the misunderstanding it causes.

Commented O’Neill:

Harmless stuff, you’d think. But it won’t be seen. Lawyers said it might be ‘culturally insensitive’. No, I can’t see why, either, but we are so paranoid … that we’ve lost our nerve. It comes to something in this Land of Free Speech (that’s a laugh) that we censor ourselves in case we MIGHT offend somebody. I suspect, though, that the real reason for this act of surrender is that some foam-flecked nutter might regard it as an ‘insult’ to his faith.

But the Cynical Dragon points out that O’Neill’s column raises problems:

1. Will the South Wales Echo apologise if radical Muslims complain about the piece? Or does it only apologise to Christian wackjobs?

2. It is strange that in a piece about freedom of speech Dan fails to mention (or perhaps was prevented from mentioning) that the South Wales Echo had edited the online version of his older article and issued an apology to Stephen Green of Christian Voice.

Note: The Freethinker set up a petition demanding that the SWE retract its apology and reinstate O’Neill’s article on the website. You can still sign it here.

Double standards sure are funny

Republicans react to Governor Palin being nominated and the announcement that Bristol Palin is pregnant:

Favorite line: In Dick Morris’ defense, he is a lying sack of shit.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F09%2F05%2Fdouble-standards-sure-are-funny%2F'; addthis_title = 'Double+standards+sure+are+funny'; addthis_pub = '';

Origin of the specious

In the New Humanist, A. C. Grayling carves up “Dissent over Descent”, the new book on Intelligent Design by the ludicrous Steve Fuller. Money quote:

Fuller has written about Popper; he seems to forget Popper’s killer point, namely, a theory that explains everything explains nothing. ID is such a theory; everything is consistent with it, nothing disproves it. The idea that there is such a thing as a deity behaves logically as a contradiction does unsurprisingly, because the idea is indeed contradictory: anything whatever follows from it. But presumably this is okay for Fuller because he was educated by Jesuits.

{{Retrieved from geoffarnold.com via RSS/ATOM.}}

Origin of the specious

Is it over yet?

I tried to avoid watching the rethugs' NurembergSt. Paul rally as much as possible, but there were a couple of nights when I couldn't avoid it while channel-surfing - the networks were giving it saturation coverage. Anyway, it occurred to me that if the proverbial man from Mars were watching, he would conclude that:
  • Barack Obama has been president for the last eight years, despite having been nothing but a (sneer) community organizer before that. (He probably deserted from the Illinois National Guard, too.)
  • The Democrats have held a monopoly on congressional and media power during the same period.
  • The Republicans are the outsiders, the change agents, the reformers who will clean up the cesspit of elite and entrenched Democratic corruption.
  • Teenage pregnancy is good, teenage pregnancy is cute, it's as American as apple pie, and a 17-year-old girl should be forced to "choose" to marry her trailer-trash statutory rapist. (Though the word "choice" is taboo for everyone else - IOKIYAR.)
In short, the rethug rabble-rousers are shamelessly lying and pandering to the dregs of ignorance and stupidity, and said dregs are massively deluded and totally out of touch with reality.

A long time ago I realized that there is simply no point in arguing with Republican true believers. You can point out for example that Palin is in bed with Ted Stevens, that she (as Stephen Colbert put it) said "yes, please" to the Bridge to Nowhere before she said "no, thanks" (and kept the $300-plus million anyway, improperly using it for other purposes), and you can cite objective sources until you are blue in the face, and the rethugbots will instinctively respond, "that's bullshit, you're a liar." It would never occur to them in a million years to look at any facts at variance with the narrative that has been endlessly drilled into them by the vast right-wing lie machine. They are like small children covering their ears and chanting, "nyah nyah nyah can't hear you."

The convention was basically a cocoon and echo chamber for such people, the ones who need to be kept on a constant hatred high and who detest the well-known liberal bias of reality. Rile up the base and flip off everyone else is McCain's strategy for electoral victory. Will it work? I await the results with trepidation. As the saying goes, no-one ever lost a penny underestimating the taste of intelligence of the American public.

(Comment on this post)

The New Epidemic


Just in case anyone was wondering, there is a new plague in the United States.

It’s called unemployment.

As of right now it is affecting 6.1% of the nations population.

Just in case you were wondering the current U.S. Population as of 3:23 pm (EST) according to www.census.gov is 305,069,312.

That’s over 300 million poor souls living in this fucked up country of ours.

In case you were unaware, at a 6.1% rate of unemployment that is around 18 million people in this country with jobs.

Think about that for a few minutes.

And then think about all of your friends who just graduated from college this year who can’t find jobs because there aren’t any to find, so they take their four hard earned years of college education and take a job as a waitress.

Is anyone else terrified?

–Katie

[Epidemics are FUN!]

Our bright and glorious future

smbc.jpg
Read the comments on this post...

Our bright and glorious future

smbc.jpg
Read the comments on this post...

Science Writers Need Science History

 Carl Zimmer does it again! This time he shows why he's the best science writer by getting three things right in the same article: (1) junk DNA, (2) the existence of regulatory sequences isn't news, and (3) history is important [Science Writers Need Science History]. I bet he reads the blogs [What's Wrong wiht Modern Science?] [Junk in Your Genome: Protein-Encoding Genes] [Stop the Press!!! ...

Quotation of the day

[This post is also available on my new site: The Barefoot Bum]

[F]rom a thousand years before St Augustine, Thales and the Pre-Socratics and Plato and Aristotle and the Stoics and Epicureans were thinking in recognisably scientific and proto-scientific ways about the nature and functioning of the universe, on the assumption that human intelligence is competent to understand the workings of nature, which observation abundantly suggests are regular and ordered – it needs no gods to point out how spring returns after every winter, and the crops grow again as they did before, and so manifestly on. Not only did people emphatically not have to wait for St Augustine to discover that they could enquire thus, without invoking supernaturalistic beliefs of any sort, but it is indeed a mark of the thought of Thales and his successors that they did not start from such beliefs, but began their thinking from observation and reason. It was the revival of their independence of thought in the Renaissance and afterwards – the rediscovery of a non-theistic tradition of thought about the world – that represented a resumption of the scientific enterprise that had been crushed by religious dogma for a millennium, and which in the 16th and 17th centuries had a struggle to free itself from religion’s iron opposition – witness the church’s denial of Copernican heliocentrism and the trial of Galileo for two related instances. And the religious are still at it today – the ID theorists are the inheritors of Cardinal Bellarmine in refusing to accept what science discovers, as is the Vatican in its opposition to stem cell research. Examples are legion. About the only thing that can explain Fuller’s effort to re-run the tired argument that modern science is the kindly gift of 16th-century religion (of the Inquisition, perhaps, in the intervals between killing people who did not believe that e.g. the sun stood still over Jericho?) is ignorance.

[emphasis added]

- A. C. Grayling

The Palin Play: Pulpits…Puppets…Politics…Profits

Quite frankly, the GOP's political parlance is the equivalent of being told that one can engage in a circle jerk with one's self. I think it is actually more akin to placing one's head up one's behind. Yes..it's still a circle...but the outcome isn't quite as pleasant.

Look, I'll happily give the GOP credit for creativity and cunning. They do both well...especially when they combine the two to further their deceptive agenda. At the same time, there is something offensive about the audacity exhibited in the execution.

I want to focus on one particular situation...one that I believe typifies the sickening symbiotic relationship that has flourished between the GOP and the religious right...a coalition akin to two ambitious and unscrupulous tramps engaged in a classic contortion...one I'd equate with a shallow and sleazy 69 suckfest.

So here's the backdrop. The McCain campaign, rightly so, rolled out their vice presidential nominee in a carefully crafted appearance at their convention. She hit all of the right notes demanded by the Christian conservatives who had threatened to twiddle their thumbs come November 4th...unless John McCain toss them a bone...or at least the lipsticked pit bull to gnaw upon the bones of the enemy.

Nothing wrong with any of that...even though I find it to be the equivalent of a marriage of convenience. After all, it's just the logical progression in the politicization of the world's oldest profession...and we know the GOP has always been "pro-business".

With that said, we can move onto the treachery...and the hypocrisy. The issue at hand is the GOP's strategy to insulate Palin from any unwanted media scrutiny...while manufacturing the meme that the mainstream media is out to get her. First, take a look at the following discussion between Chris Matthews, Pat Buchanan, and Michelle Bernard. In the video, Buchanan adopts this meme and argues that the GOP and the McCain campaign have every right to shield Palin from "unfair" media scrutiny.

Matthews, who I've often criticized for his biased treatment of Hillary Clinton, correctly calls Buchanan on his shameless spinning of campaign rhetoric. In essence, Buchanan and those complicit in the effort to use Palin for political gain (the GOP elite and their Christian conservative cohorts) are attempting to craft a paper-thin persona they feel will garner votes in November.

Again, nothing wrong with that objective...since every campaign does the same. However, the McCain campaign has chosen to take it to another level...electing to scapegoat the mainstream media in order to prevent them from scrutinizing Palin. In truth, it hasn't been the MSM that dug into Palin's personal life...but they want to make that case in order to justify their refusal to make their candidate available for questioning.

As if this weren't enough, the strategy has taken another turn designed to further sully the media and keep Palin in a protective bubble. Shortly after the McCain operatives initiated this strategy, some members of the MSM suggested that the campaign would schedule a few softball interviews and then argue that they had, in fact, made the candidate available. The goal, of course, centers on keeping Palin away from the tough questions.

Enter the manufactured GOP outrage aimed at Oprah. As the Drudge Report story goes, Oprah and her staff have been engaged in an internal spat over whether they should schedule Palin for an appearance prior to the election. Mind you, this contrived consternation is coming from the same people who routinely attack Oprah...accusing her of a liberal bias, of promoting a false religion, and of being a part of the elite celebrity media.

So here's the multi-faceted set up. The GOP and the McCain campaign don't want Palin interviewed by the media...but they also want to discredit those portions of the media they frequently frame as left-leaning elitists...all designed to further the idealized image they are attempting to attach to Governor Palin in the minds of voters. Call it theater in the extreme.

Let's jump ahead to the end view. Absent palpable positions on the issues, the damaged GOP brand must rely upon caricature creation, character assassination, and cynicism if they hope to win in November. Hence, the selection of Palin must be viewed as an expedient political calculation. Pick a relatively unknown woman from a remote state...who can energize the tepid evangelical base...capitalize upon the anger over the Clinton loss...offset the historic ramifications of a black candidate...and inoculate the party and the candidate from the media scrutiny that would accompany such a superficial strategy.

As such, the goal was to maintain secrecy, strike first, strike often, repeat the meme regardless of the facts, and hope to convince voters that every segment of the media is wrong and biased...thereby discrediting or diminishing any of the facts that may come to light about Governor Palin. In other words, the goal was to avoid all media appearances and infer the totality of the partiality found in every segment of the media. In fact, they never intended to have Palin appear on Oprah...they simply made the calculation that an inquiry would return a declination and allow the advancement of the meme.

Disgusting as this strategy may be, the real tragedy is far greater...as is the need to insure that it doesn't come to pass. The unholy alliance that exists between the evangelical elite and the GOP elite...designed to dupe voters...must be exposed and broken. Otherwise, change will never occur.

Unfortunately, this double-headed monster has succeeded in melding the narrow and intransigent mindset of morality, held by a majority of voters, with the overarching and well-disguised ambitions of those who stand shielded from scrutiny behind the pulpit and/or the podium. So long as these two tyrants are able to execute their obfuscated objectives, they will pursue and produce the propaganda needed to perpetuate their obsession for power and profit...at any cost.

Therefore, this election may well be the quintessential battle to break the strangle hold of those who have shown little hesitation to place their hunger for power ahead of the health and well-being of the nation. Like the religion they invoke to achieve these goals, the promises they make to the voters they court are equally ethereal and lacking substance. While they espouse the virtue of values in order to win votes, they defy virtue while working tirelessly to amass all that they view to have material value.

So long as we enable them to obtain their earthly desires, we will continue to forego the future we are told to faithfully await. It's an exchange we can no longer afford. Sarah Palin is a puppet...perhaps a knowing one...perhaps not...but a puppet nonetheless. This theater of the absurd will only go dark when voters demand a better production...in the ballot box.

Into the Textbooks It Goes

 This week's issue of Science contains an important paper. Maier, T,, Leibundgut, M. and B. Nenad (2008) The Crystal Structure of a Mammalian Fatty Acid Synthase. Science 321:1315-1322.We've known for a long time that this is a very important enzyme and that it's a classic example of a little protein machine combining the activities of may different enzymes in order to carry out the complex

Citation Classic: Recombinant DNA

 Read John Dennehy's citation classic for this week at This Week's Citation Classic: Genetic Engineering. The paper is one of the first examples of genetic engineering and recombinant DNA technology. Before you go, try and guess when the paper was published. Was it before you were born or after? [Photo Credit: Protesters at the National Academy of Sciences Forum on Recombinant DNA from The

Penn Jillette on the Election

Penn Jillette (of Penn & Teller) wrote a commentary for CNN on the upcoming election — from his Libertarian point of view:

Barack Obama is way smarter than Bush — so way, way smarter than me. Obama is way more charismatic than me. He did his big speech for about 80,000 people; I’ll do my show tonight in Vegas for about 1,000 people. He’s more ambitious than I; he’s going to be the next president of the United States, and I couldn’t even get to week three of “Dancing with the Stars.”

But I don’t think our next president being a great leader is a good thing.

We need someone stupid enough to understand that the president of the United States can’t solve many problems without taking away freedom and therefore shouldn’t try. The only reason John McCain scares me a little less is because I think he’s a little less likely to win. They both promise a government that will watch over us, and I don’t like that.

The choice shouldn’t be which lesser of two evils should have the enormous power of our modern presidents. The question should be, who would do less as president? Who would leave us alone?

If we could find a lazier, less charismatic, stupider person than me to be president, I’d be all for it. But, it’s not going to be easy; stupider than me is rare breed.

So remember, the only way to waste your vote is to vote!

While it may be nice if the government imposed on our lives less, many of our problems can be fixed only through government intervention.

If John McCain and Sarah Palin win the election, you can bet they’ll be trying to take over decisions you ought to be making on your own. Barack Obama wouldn’t want that.

Not voting at all? That would be idiotic. There’s too much at stake to sit back and let the Republicans take over once again.

Watch Sarah Palin Squirm

Sarah Palin. Steely, controlled, resolute. That's what we've been served by the RNC. That's all we've seen of her: one speech from the best writers money can by; gushing packages from Fox News; fawning from the Religious Right, falling over themselves to claim her as their own...

Wanna see her squirm?

Hat tip to the lovely Andrew Sullivan for putting me on to Mudflats, a blog on Alaskan politics for whom Christmas, Hanukkah and Duvali seem to have come all at once together. It's latest report dishes the latest dirt on the Troopergate scandal, and links to this must-see ABC item featuring some pricelessly cringe-worthy body language from T-XMrs Palin.



There's lots more of this to come I'm sure...

And in other news (Denyse O'Leary stylee)......Thanks for stopping by :)

PTET

Fight, Fight, Fight!

Gov. Sarah Palin has burst on the scene with style, guts — and a penchant for distorting the facts, thanks to Bush’s former speech writer who wrote her speech Wednesday night. Some highlights of the actual story: Barack Obama in fact did author (co-author) an important bill in the state senate, on ethics, specifically campaign funds. Remember, he’s the first major candidate in history to waive the right to receive "public" funds — from Political Action Committees, lobbyists and corporations. Remember, he’s raised more money in history, and all from individuals. John McCain may have passed a groundbreaking ethics bill, McCain-Feingold, for which he should be commended, but he still opted to receive public funds, and has raised less than Obama.

Many of you might also be wondering about Obama’s recent statement that the surge worked. Well, it’s true that things are finally better in Iraq. And that’s a great thing. In fact, Bush is talking about withdrawal according to Maliki’s timetable. Flip-flopping’s got nothing to do with it, and I’m confident that in the debates Obama will address accusations of flip-flopping much more effectively than Kerry did in 2004.

Regarding the Georgian conflict, I’ve read a lot of info on the issue from various sources. While I’m alarmed at Russian aggression, there seems to be some evidence that the Georgian government has been discriminating against the ethnic Russians in their breakaway states of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Read the history at wikipedia and some more background at amnesty.org. The conflict is not simple, and is undoubtedly frustrating. For instance, how the Russians can ignore their own treatment of Chechnya and condemn Georgia’s treatment of its breakaways is beyond me. Obama’s statements about Georgia, for me, reflect more of an understanding of foreign policy than the "one-answer-for-everything" treatment McCain gave the issue last night… I felt like when he talked about solidarity with the Georgians, he might as well have been Reagan talking about Nicaragua or Afghanistan, when every issue is much more nuanced.

Don’t back down on this fight!

Share This